Browsing Category

Articles

It Can’t Happen Here – Embracing A Chaotic Future

It Can't Happen Here - Embracing A Chaotic Future
Photo Credit: Carleton Thomas Anderson

One of my favorite blogs is called Granola Shotgun.  For those who have never encountered this gem of the blogosphere before, Granola Shotgun is an eclectic collection of observations and editorials surrounding the topics of real estate, human nature, disaster preparedness and urban planning.  This might sound like an unlikely combination of themes, but let me assure you, the author (Johnny) has some superb insights into contemporary American culture.

I found one of Johnny’s recent posts, titled “Ich Will den Kaiser Zurück“, to be particularly compelling.  It deals indirectly with a theme that I have encountered again and again when researching investments: the idea that “it can’t happen here”.

I will quote a relevant portion from the post below (although I do encourage you to read the full article if you have time):

“I had a slow motion epiphany regarding the newest generation of smart charming guests from places like Sweden, Japan, Turkey, and Germany. They have no visceral memory of the twentieth century. They’ve read about it. But they were born so long after the traumatic upheavals that it’s just words. Their parents were born after World War II had already ended. And then it hit me. Their grandparents were born after the war. It’s ancient history. It goes without saying Americans have even more historical amnesia.”

This passage really struck me, perfectly crystallizing some of the troubling thoughts I had long had, but was unable to perfectly organize.  As a lover of all things antique, I have a certain affinity with history.  I am well aware that humanity repeats the same errors again and again throughout time, yet somehow still manages to delude itself into thinking that it’s different this time.

And nowhere is this historical ignorance more apparent than in the world of investing.  We are constantly bombarded by platitudes such as “buy stocks for the long run” and “the trend is your friend”.  And for many, many years these hollow phrases have seemingly worked.  In fact, they’ve worked so well that we think it can’t happen here.

What is “it”?

Banking crises, revolutions, capital controls and civil unrest are just a few of the potential disasters we face in the modern age.  These events have occurred with stunning regularity throughout history.  The United States, Western Europe and Japan have simply been lucky enough to avoid the worst of these problems in the brief, 75-year sliver of time since the end of World War II.  Unfortunately for humanity, good times breed complacency, and complacency breeds bad times.

And make no mistake, the bad times are coming.  The safeguards that should help protect us from repeating these mistakes are failing as our institutional memory fades.

Want an example?

Look no further than the revered halls of the U.S. Federal Reserve.  This most important of banking institutions has been busy pursuing destabilizing bubble-centric policies for a full 20 years at this point.  Their perpetual hope is that their latest round of money printing will finally drag the economy out of its stolid torpor.  And yet it never quite happens.

There are plenty of unpleasant side effects from it, though.

The banks bulge with the profits of usury.  The equity markets race toward the moon.  Those who are already rich become exponentially wealthier.  And all the while the average wage-earner wallows in financial misery.

A revolution?  It can’t happen here!  Can it?

Let me make a prediction.  At the end of this orgy of financial speculation, it will make little difference how many zeros are attached to the end of your bank statement.  Wealth will almost certainly not be measured in dollars, euros, yen or pounds anymore.

Instead, wealth will be determined by possession of physical goods – and not necessarily real estate.

This is an eventuality that few people are truly prepared for, myself included.  Most of my portfolio still resides in conventional assets like stocks, bonds and cash.  But I have been slowly preparing myself mentally for the changes that will take place.  I’ve been buying more gold and silver bullion.  I’ve been continuing to purchase investment grade antiques.  I’ve been getting more comfortable with the idea of saving in terms of ounces as opposed to dollars.  I’m edging towards the proverbial financial fire escape.

All of this vaguely ominous talk might seem rather conspiratorial, but it is pretty obvious that Western society is beginning to fray around the edges.  It’s rather funny that some people claim it can’t happen here when the U.S. population is clearly splitting along pro-Trump/Resistance lines.  And I’m not sure that the Brexit-addled U.K. or sclerotic Continental Europe is much better off.

Civil war looms distant on our gray horizon.

I would prefer that society not go down this ill-advised route.  But it seems as if we are being compelled by forces far more powerful than you or me.  The Treasury spends with abandon.  The Fed prints as if there are no consequences.  Politicians viciously attack each other in myopic attempts to win the next election at all costs.  I’m not the first person to say this, but all of this arrogance will end badly.

Never, never believe anyone who says it can’t happen here.  Wars, hyperinflations and civil disturbances have occurred across dozens of advanced civilizations in the not very distant past.  We are not special in this regard.  It can happen to us too.  It almost certainly will happen to us if we give it enough time.

This is why I implore you to prepare through the acquisition of tangible assets.  Buy yourself some pre-1965 junk silver coins.  Start a collection of Edo era Japanese samurai sword fittings.  Indulge yourself with a vintage Must de Cartier wristwatch.  These are relatively safe ways to save and invest in a world that is starting to spin out of control.

 

Read more thought-provoking Antique Sage editorial articles here.

-or-

Read in-depth Antique Sage investment guides here.

Ancient Ptolemaic Bronze Coins

Ancient Ptolemaic Bronze Coins
Photo Credit: highrating_lowprice

We live in an age of striking impermanence.  And yet we occasionally stumble across something that is the antithesis of the ephemeral.  Sometimes an item – a very special item – speaks to us across the void of millennia, connecting us with civilizations long dead.

This is exactly how I feel about the Ptolemaic bronze coins of ancient Egypt.

The Ptolemaic dynasty was a remarkable Hellenistic empire founded by one of Alexander the Great’s finest generals, Ptolemy I.  After Alexander died unexpectedly in 323 BC, Ptolemy I carved an Egyptian kingdom out of the ruins of Alexander’s rapidly disintegrating empire.   By fusing Greek culture with native Egyptian customs, the Ptolemies created the most successful and enduring of Alexander’s successor states.

Ptolemy I’s empire lasted longer than any other major Hellenistic kingdom, only meeting its end in 30 BC after its infamous queen, the cunning seductress Cleopatra, was defeated at the great battle of Actium in the Ionian Sea.  Rather than enduring a humiliating surrender to Rome’s first emperor, Augustus Caesar, Cleopatra instead chose to commit suicide via the poisonous bite of a deadly asp.

Ancient Ptolemaic bronze coins usually display the laureate, ram-horned head of the god Zeus-Ammon on the obverse and a noble eagle (or twin eagles) on the reverse.  Zeus-Ammon was the Hellenistic synthesis of Zeus, the Greek king of the gods, and his horned Egyptian counterpart Ammon.  This merger of Greek and Egyptian culture reflected Ptolemaic policies promoting themselves as the new Pharaohs of Egypt.

There are remarkably few ancient and medieval bronze coins that can be considered investment worthy.  I am of the opinion that only Imperial Roman bronze coinage joins its Ptolemaic peers in meriting serious investment consideration.  Being low denomination pieces, pre-modern bronze coinage was often carelessly minted via sloppy striking with crude dies.  This resulted in poor quality coins that collectors tend to pass up in favor of gold or silver coins.

Fortunately, ancient Ptolemaic bronze coins were a notable exception to this rule.  Dies engraved in the finest Greek style were used to meticulously strike these numismatic masterpieces in magnificently high relief.  In addition, Ptolemaic bronze coins can be enormous, reaching up to 50 millimeters (2 inches) in diameter and 100 grams (3.5 ounces) in weight.

Interestingly, most examples have a small, depressed dimple on the center of both faces of the coin.  This is a commonplace byproduct of the ancient manufacturing process.

When purchasing these marvelous ancient coins it is important to look for examples that are well-centered, well-struck and have a pleasing patina.  Patina is a thin layer of attractive oxidation that accumulates on a bronze coin over the course of centuries.  Although green or brown patinas are most commonly encountered, a myriad of other colors is also possible, including black, red and even blue!

A fine patina not only materially increases the beauty and value of a bronze coin, but also protects it against harmful corrosion as well. This is one of the reasons ancient or medieval bronze coinage should never be cleaned.

Bronze coins were the workhorse denominations of the ancient Mediterranean world, regularly used to purchase life’s necessities like bread, olive oil and wine.  Consequently, surviving specimens tend to be heavily worn.  Therefore, it is imperative to only consider coins with light to moderate wear.

Ancient bronze coins could also circulate for immense lengths of times, causing some pieces to be worn down to little more than smooth metal slugs.  In one anecdotal story, an ancient Imperial Roman bronze coin was found counterstruck with a revaluation mark from 16th century Spain, implying that the piece circulated continuously for approximately 1500 years!

Another key attribute to consider when collecting Egyptian Ptolemaic bronze coins is size.  A bronze coin’s size is expressed in conjunction the abbreviation “AE” – which stands for bronze – followed by a number that reflects the coin’s diameter in millimeters.  As an example, “AE30” would be a bronze coin with a diameter of 30 millimeters.

I consider investment quality Ptolemaic bronze coinage to start at 27 or 28 millimeters in diameter, with specimens over 30 millimeters being preferable.  As you can probably guess, the larger a coin is, the higher its price.  This is understandable, as larger Egyptian Ptolemaic bronze coins were struck in such high relief as to border on being ancient sculpture, rather than merely coins!

An Egyptian Ptolemaic bronze coin portraying the ram-horned god Zeus-Ammon with his wild, windswept hair is the epitome of ancient Greek Hellenistic art.  And yet these timeless coins are still grossly underappreciated in today’s art market.  Investment grade examples start at around $100 and go up to about $500 in price.  Truly magnificent, museum quality coins are uncommon, but will sometimes be offered for sale above $500.

As these coins become more widely acknowledged, prices are certain to rise.  After all, a massive, high-relief bronze coin that captures the ancient cultural amalgamation of Hellenistic Greece and Pharaonic Egypt is a work of art to be coveted.

 

Read more thought-provoking Antique Sage coin articles here.

-or-

Read in-depth Antique Sage investment guides here.

The Cruel Myth of Dividend Growth Investing

The Cruel Myth of Dividend Growth Investing

One of the blogs that I frequent is called the Dividend Growth Investor.  I found one of its recent posts, titled “A Case Study of My Investment in Kraft Foods” to be particularly intriguing.  Of course, what I found most interesting about the post is how badly it misinterpreted the past and incorrectly forecasts the future.

So let’s dig into some of the ugly details.

The crux of the article is that the author invested in Kraft Foods (KFT) way back in April 2010 at just over $30 a share.  The intervening years were good, with a grand total of $17.88 paid out in dividends (to early 2019).  In addition, the original company split into two successor companies: Mondelez (MDLZ) and Kraft Heinz (KHC), which are worth about $58 after accounting for mergers and spinoffs.

The reason the author wrote the post was to prove that even a mediocre dividend growth investing play can still work out alright.  In this case, Kraft Heinz cut its dividend in February 2019, prompting shares in the firm to collapse from $48 to around $34 a share.

No worries, though!  Our intrepid dividend growth blogger simply sold his shares at the going market price in the wake of the dividend cut because Kraft Heinz no longer met his investment criteria.  Even accounting for this unfortunate divestiture, he still claimed a robust 11.1% annualized return (without reinvesting dividends) over the nearly 9 year period – more than doubling his money.

This seems like a great return, all thanks to (in his words) “selecting quality companies at good valuations, being diversified, and maintaining proper risk management techniques.”

The only problem is that his dividend growth investment strategy is a lie.  But like all good lies, it is clothed in half truths.

First off, he really did get an 11.1% per annum return from dividend growth investing.  But the more important question is: how exactly?  And can you and I replicate his success?

These are crucial details.  He would like you to believe that his good fortune was the product of buying a “solid company” at a “reasonable valuation” and then holding for the “long term”.  And if we were living in an economically normal environment, these justifications might be believable.

But these are not economically normal times.  Instead, what we’ve experienced over the past decade has been nothing less than the largest securities market bubble in the history of the world.  It is bigger than Japan’s twin real estate/stock market bubble in the 1980s, bigger than the Dutch Tulip Mania in the 1630s and bigger than the Wall Street Bubble of 1929.

Our current bubble exists on an almost incomprehensible scale.  In fact, our modern-day “Everything Bubble” is so massive that it pervades every niche and corner of the real economy, making it almost impossible for the average person to spot.  In other words, like a fish swimming through water, investors don’t realize they are lazily meandering through a vast bubble miasma.

What does this have to do with Kraft Foods and dividend growth investing?

It’s simple.  Investors in Kraft and other dividend growth companies did well over the past decade not because they were stock picking geniuses or because the firms had solid fundamentals, but because the Federal Reserve (and other central banks) inflated history’s greatest securities market bubble.

Kraft Foods took advantage of the Fed’s cheap money policies to buy back billions of dollars worth of their own shares over the years.  And they paid out generous dividends as well, amounting to billions of dollars more.  But here’s the kicker: the company didn’t have the cash flow from operations to pay out these billions of dollars.  Instead, the firm’s management financed these shareholder goodies by levering up their balance sheet!

What this means is that past shareholders (like our dividend growth investing blogger) benefited, while current and future shareholders will pay the price.  Both of Kraft Foods’ successor companies – Mondelez and Kraft Heinz – have accumulated substantial debt loads from these past financial sins.  Mondelez currently carries $19.4 billion in corporate debt while Kraft Heinz sports an eye-watering $31.3 billion debt load.  Oh, and both companies also have negative tangible book values, meaning their factories, offices and other physical assets are worth far, far less than the sums they’ve borrowed.

This is all a fancy way of saying that the future prospects for Mondelez and Kraft Heinz are questionable at best.  At worst, their high debt loads could ultimately endanger the future viability of both companies.  I know I wouldn’t want to own them.

Regardless, our dividend growth investing blogger can claim a Pyrrhic victory of sorts.  After all, he got out with a tidy profit despite Kraft’s pitfalls.  But it is important to note that he only made money because he sold before the bubble burst!  There are millions of current dividend growth investors who won’t get the message in time.  These unfortunates have swallowed the myth of “investing in stocks for the long term” and will inevitably ride the collapsing Everything Bubble into financial ruin.

So if you were to sell, where should you put the proceeds?

Well I can certainly tell you were you shouldn’t reinvest your windfall.  It is imperative you stay away from dividend growth companies.  Indeed, it would be wise to avoid the stock market altogether.  While there will always be a few niche industries that outperform regardless of the macro environment, I couldn’t begin to hazard a guess as to who will be the lucky winners.  Unfortunately, most companies will simply collapse in value once the Everything Bubble pops.

In fact, this prediction is already coming to pass.  Shares of Kraft Heinz have sagged from $34 to $28 in the last few months – an additional 17% loss on top of its earlier waterfall decline.

 

Kraft Heinz Stock Chart - The Cruel Myth of Dividend Growth Investing

 

I like cash as an alternative to redeploying money into the markets at the moment.  4-week U.S. Treasury bills are currently paying around 2.35%, which I find to be a decent risk-free rate in a world where most investment returns will undoubtedly have a negative sign in front of them.

For those looking for a little more investment potential, I find that tangible assets offer great value.  Gold, silver and platinum bullion are perennial favorites, with strong return profiles and almost no possibility of major capital impairment.  Investment grade antiques such as vintage wristwatches, antique jewelry and rare coins are also great choices.  They are tremendous bargains in the current environment, although you do have to exercise some caution due to their illiquidity.

In the final analysis, dividend growth investing is the cruelest lie of all – a seductive investment myth that has propagated because of the Federal Reserve’s Everything Bubble.

 

Read more thought-provoking Antique Sage investing articles here.

-or-

Read in-depth Antique Sage investment guides here.

The Vintage Costume Jewelry Collecting Fad

The Vintage Costume Jewelry Collecting Fad
Photo Credit: Housing Works Thrift Shop

Vintage costume jewelry is a hot trend right now.  A quick search on eBay will reveal over half a million examples for sale, ranging from the 1930s to the 1980s.  And it sells too.  Almost 200,000 pieces of vintage costume jewelry have sold on the online auction giant over the past six months.

Although inexpensive jewelry has been with us since the time of the Roman Empire, modern costume jewelry really came about in the 1920s.  This was a period of incredible prosperity and loosening social mores for women.  Newly independent women began looking for ways to experiment with jewelry as a fashion accessory.  Unfortunately, traditional jewelry made from precious metals and gemstones was far too expensive to wear casually or haphazardly.

This was the pivotal moment in history when the renowned French fashion designer, Coco Chanel, spawned an industry.  In the late 1920s she released a line of costume jewelry that allowed women to indulge in their wildest jewelry fantasies without breaking the bank.  She was soon followed by other well-recognized vintage costume jewelry brands, such as Trifari, Coro, Christian Dior, Miriam Haskell, and Napier.

The nascent costume jewelry industry soon received an unexpected boost from the advent of World War II.  This global conflict restricted access to traditional precious materials.  Suddenly gold and platinum from South Africa no longer reached Nazi-occupied Europe.  Likewise, rubies and sapphires from Burma were cut off from the West by the Japanese occupation of Southeast Asia.

This meant that costume jewelry was often the only game in town.  It was made from inexpensive and readily available materials like gilt-brass, silver, plastic and glass rhinestones.  However, considerable effort went into its design and marketing to ensure a high quality product that appealed to a broad range of women.

In spite of its storied history and interesting designs, there is something about vintage costume jewelry that really bothers me.  Specifically, I’m worried about the extreme prices that some people are willing to pay for what amounts to faux jewelry.  To be blunt, costume jewelry – even brand-name vintage pieces – shouldn’t be reaching the exceptionally high prices that it is.

The vintage costume jewelry market has all the hallmarks of a fad.

For example, almost 600 eBay listings of vintage costume jewelry from major makers sold within the past 6 months (as of May 2019) for more than $200.  Fully 49 examples even sold for more than $1,000.  And there are undoubtedly many other high value sales of lesser known makers as well.

Now many people might argue that it isn’t possible to buy “fine” jewelry – vintage or otherwise – for only a few hundred dollars.  So what is wrong with paying a couple C-notes for a very nice (and sometimes historically significant) piece of vintage costume jewelry?

My complaint is that vintage costume jewelry is not (and never will be) investment grade.  Sure, if you love it, buy it.  Just be aware that you are collecting, not investing.  Vintage costume jewelry will never reliably appreciate in value like a piece of fine vintage jewelry.

Let’s examine a real life comparison between a piece of vintage costume jewelry and a piece of fine, albeit modern, jewelry:

 

The Vintage Costume Jewelry Collecting Fad - comparison

Photo Credit: Floridas-Ultimate-Treasures & Cutterstone

The piece on the left is a late 1940s Jewels of Tanjore brooch by Trifari.  It is made from vermeil (gold plated sterling silver) and set with glass stones.  The design was inspired by the Indian jewelry of the British Maharajas.  It sold on eBay on November 11, 2018 for $359.95 (plus $6.00 shipping).

The contemporary Modernist piece on the right is a sterling silver and 14 karat gold pendant by Cutterstone, a small artisan jeweler based in Calimesa, California.  The piece was cast using a hand-carved cuttlebone mold, which is destroyed in the production process.  It was then laboriously hand-finished and set with a natural, 1.27 carat purple-pink, marquise-cut sapphire and a smaller, 0.24 carat beryllium-diffused, round-cut orange sapphire.  I purchased it on Etsy in 2016 for $365 (plus $3.50 shipping).

The Trifari Jewels of Tanjore brooch was mass-produced in a factory by the thousands.  It is likely that hundreds of them are still extant today.  I (generously) estimate the scrap value of the sterling silver used in it at $10 to $12.

In contrast, the Cutterstone pendant was individually designed and hand-made by an experienced craftsman.  And due to the cuttlebone casting, there will only ever be one in existence.  I estimate the intrinsic value of this piece to conservatively be around $300.  As an FYI, I featured a pair of luscious Cutterstone sterling silver earrings in one of my recent Spotlight posts.

The vintage Trifari piece cost $365.95, delivered; the Modernist Cutterstone piece cost $368.50, delivered.  They were effectively the same price.

 

Affordable Vintage Karat Gold Jewelry for Sale on eBay

(This is an affiliate link for which I may be compensated)

 

And yet the Cutterstone pendant is a one-of-a-kind work of art that will undoubtedly age into a fine antique over time.  Its organic lines and superb sense of proportions are truly stunning.  The very real, very enticing, very high quality sapphires merely sweeten the deal.  It is a consummate investment grade piece of jewelry.

On the other hand, this is as good as it’s ever going to get for the Trifari piece.  It is a mass-produced brooch with very little intrinsic value.  Its design is solid, but not particularly original or groundbreaking (there was a lot of Indian-style jewelry being released in the 1940s and 1950s).  Yes, it does have a famous brand name attached to it, but it is a name intimately associated with costume jewelry.  Trifari is no Tiffany & Co. or Cartier.  This is not an investment-oriented piece of jewelry, despite the fact that price trends have been quite favorable for vintage costume jewelry over the past decade.

One of these pieces is a great buy at $370 and one is not.  The worst part is that both pieces use the same primary medium – sterling silver.  Yet there is still a world of difference between them.

In my opinion it would be wise for jewelry collectors and connoisseurs to avoid buying vintage costume pieces at anywhere above $100 or possibly $200.  It is simply too easy to find compelling examples of real jewelry at the latter price point to fool around with fake or junk jewelry, vintage or not.

 

Cutterstone Hand-Crafted Jewelry for Sale on Etsy

(These are affiliate links for which I may be compensated)

 

Read more thought-provoking Antique Sage gems & jewelry articles here.

-or-

Read in-depth Antique Sage vintage jewelry investment guides here.